FRAUD
Here are the links
Mine: http://www.vinovas.com/en/image/11599/they-have-no-eyes/
His: http://www.vinovas.com/en/image/11602/me
YOU SLANDER MY GOOD NAME OF ALL THEY KNOW OF . AS LEGEND. AS HERO. WHAT IS YOUR? WHAT IS THIS TOEIM? WHAT HAVR YOU DONE.
YEAR AGO ADMIRAL HELP WRITE DOCUMENT NAMED NOW BILL OF RIGHT WHICH PROTEX SUCH SATIRICAL WIRK ------ SO BE THANKING TO THAT I ARENT SUE YOU!!!!! YOU COPY MY WIRK BUT I SEE YOU HAVE ONE IN TEN MILLIONS TALENT I GRACE CANVAS WITH THEREFOR I CAN SURMISE IT IS NOT AT ALL THIEF. BE LUCKY FOR IT (THAT),
IF NOT UNDERSTOOD ACKBAR THE IMMORTAL UNQUESTIONABLE WILL RIP TOEM'S HEART FROM CHEST AND EAT IT BEFORE PARENTS. SLANDER SALAMANDER..
A thief is a thief and thieves do not belong on vinovas!
YOU + ARE = YOU'RE
INVALID SCUMBALL
Sorry, where is it clear?
Is it his small comment under his picture that makes it clear?
Please provide a link that makes it clear.
And don't worry, I won't be a thief, am not a thief, and was never a thief.
I am pretty sure you will respond.
Scum.
Hi, I understand it says (c) 1981.
What i don't understand, is how you can simply belive it.
I could comment on my piece saying (c) 1921, but of course it take s two seconds to see it's a lie.
My image details say:
03-04-2010, 04:19:15
And His say:
03-04-2010, 05:01:53
---
Just because he posted something saying (c) 1981, doesn't stop the facts.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
YOUR WORDS, FLESHY GAS-BAG
Next page
Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 5:54:15 PM
Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 5:54:54 PM
whoops.Here are the links
Mine: http://www.vinovas.com/en/image/11599/they-have-no-eyes/
His: http://www.vinovas.com/en/image/11602/me
AdmiralAckbar on March 4th, 2010 at 6:31:29 PM
TOEIIMYOU SLANDER MY GOOD NAME OF ALL THEY KNOW OF . AS LEGEND. AS HERO. WHAT IS YOUR? WHAT IS THIS TOEIM? WHAT HAVR YOU DONE.
YEAR AGO ADMIRAL HELP WRITE DOCUMENT NAMED NOW BILL OF RIGHT WHICH PROTEX SUCH SATIRICAL WIRK ------ SO BE THANKING TO THAT I ARENT SUE YOU!!!!! YOU COPY MY WIRK BUT I SEE YOU HAVE ONE IN TEN MILLIONS TALENT I GRACE CANVAS WITH THEREFOR I CAN SURMISE IT IS NOT AT ALL THIEF. BE LUCKY FOR IT (THAT),
IF NOT UNDERSTOOD ACKBAR THE IMMORTAL UNQUESTIONABLE WILL RIP TOEM'S HEART FROM CHEST AND EAT IT BEFORE PARENTS. SLANDER SALAMANDER..
Brian on March 4th, 2010 at 6:32:38 PM
This is definitely interesting, but I don't know if I'd call it fraud. Ackbar's gallery consists almost entirely of satirical work (which happens to be protected under U.S. copyright law). The copyright date and the accusations would have to be in jest since, as you pointed out, the digital medium wasn't advanced enough in the 1980s to produce the art in question.Brian on March 4th, 2010 at 6:33:53 PM
Admiral Ackbar; wow.Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:39:28 PM
Obviously he's lying! It's so clear! I don't care who he is!A thief is a thief and thieves do not belong on vinovas!
AdmiralAckbar on March 4th, 2010 at 6:42:03 PM
THEN GTFO LAMB-CHOPDeleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:44:18 PM
Your being retarded! You are writing incorrectly deliberately. Your style is nothing like your most recent piece or anything. Just admit it. You are trolling deliberately. STOP.ReapZor on March 4th, 2010 at 6:45:54 PM
I only wish that one day Ackbar would make a satire piece of one of my images. Every Ackbar is a unique treasure, and always jam packed with lols.Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:46:56 PM
WHAT!?Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:47:24 PM
Who is this guy!?Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:48:32 PM
This guy is a star wars fanboy! Who the hell!?AdmiralAckbar on March 4th, 2010 at 6:48:56 PM
"Your being retarded! You are writing incorrectly deliberately. Your style is nothing like your most recent piece or anything. Just admit it. You are trolling deliberately. STOP."YOU + ARE = YOU'RE
INVALID SCUMBALL
Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:51:25 PM
'You're' pissing me off. You are wasting my time. You have stolen my art. You will get kicked out if you keep this up.ReapZor on March 4th, 2010 at 6:52:33 PM
I am one of those people who doesn't exist; a browser, not a submitter. You know, the types that apparently show there is no community here.Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:53:51 PM
I wasn't asking you. But thanks.AdmiralAckbar on March 4th, 2010 at 6:56:27 PM
- This post has been deleted by staff -Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 6:57:27 PM
Brian....AdmiralAckbar on March 4th, 2010 at 7:18:26 PM
TOOIM...NOTACKBAR on March 4th, 2010 at 7:24:37 PM
I of course, being NOTACKBAR, am a completely neutral party with no stake in this conflict whatsoever. AdmiralAckbar's piece was clearly copyrighted in 1981. toiim, don't be a thief.Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 7:28:23 PM
clearly copyrighted in 1981.Sorry, where is it clear?
Is it his small comment under his picture that makes it clear?
Please provide a link that makes it clear.
And don't worry, I won't be a thief, am not a thief, and was never a thief.
AdmiralAckbar on March 4th, 2010 at 7:29:59 PM
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.NOTACKBAR on March 4th, 2010 at 7:31:35 PM
It says so right there. 1981. It says it, don't you tell me it doesn't. I'm NOTACKBAR.Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 7:31:40 PM
I thought you would never stop. I am glad you will no longer respond to me. However, I don't think you will.I am pretty sure you will respond.
Scum.
Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 7:33:39 PM
To NOTACKBARHi, I understand it says (c) 1981.
What i don't understand, is how you can simply belive it.
I could comment on my piece saying (c) 1921, but of course it take s two seconds to see it's a lie.
NOTACKBAR on March 4th, 2010 at 7:36:40 PM
I AM A LAWYER AND I KNOW THESE THINGS AND IT SAYS 1981 I AM A WITNESS TO THIS AND WILL HELP SUE YOU IF YOU DON'T STOP LYING ABOUT HIS LYING SIR.Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 7:38:13 PM
here:My image details say:
03-04-2010, 04:19:15
And His say:
03-04-2010, 05:01:53
---
Just because he posted something saying (c) 1981, doesn't stop the facts.
AdmiralAckbar on March 4th, 2010 at 7:39:27 PM
I DIDN'T MAKE IT TODAY. THAT ONLY PROVES SUBMISSION DATE, RETARD.I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
I will no longer respond to you. You are the lowest type of scum.
YOUR WORDS, FLESHY GAS-BAG
Deleted User on March 4th, 2010 at 5:54:02 PM
This guy copied my art. I want him off vinovas.not so much the copying, but the fact he accused me of copying HIM. I is extremely obvious that he copied me. He submitted his work after me. Then he claims he did it in 1981, which was when the Atari was around.
So digital art like his was impossible.
The dimensions for the head of my character and his are exactly the same. He even used parts of my poetry in the description.
With all this, he still accused me. Please Brian take him off.