I was wondering who would be interested in the ability to extend their subVariance galleries to their online websites.
I'm going to start coding a small drop-in set of scripts for use on personal sites that would allow users to use their sV galleries. Basically, I plan to offer two versions:
- A PHP version that can be dropped into a directory and included on a page
- An AJAX version that will interface with sV through XML (intended for people who don't have access to PHP)
I intend to allow full theming of the gallery as well as interfacing with the new features coming in the next version of the site. I'd like to know which one people are more likely to use. I currently assume that the AJAX one will be more popular, as it will have lower requirements and will be easiest to use, however the PHP one will be more customizable for those who know how to code.
savagedryad on May 23rd, 2006 at 12:25:08 AM
hmmm I honestly dont know as I use a page building program that holds my hand. SO I would use the eaisy one I guess.
Interact
Please sign in to post a reply. If you don't have an account, you can sign up now for free!
Brian on December 31st, 1969 at 5:00:00 PM
I was wondering who would be interested in the ability to extend their subVariance galleries to their online websites.I'm going to start coding a small drop-in set of scripts for use on personal sites that would allow users to use their sV galleries. Basically, I plan to offer two versions:
- A PHP version that can be dropped into a directory and included on a page
- An AJAX version that will interface with sV through XML (intended for people who don't have access to PHP)
I intend to allow full theming of the gallery as well as interfacing with the new features coming in the next version of the site. I'd like to know which one people are more likely to use. I currently assume that the AJAX one will be more popular, as it will have lower requirements and will be easiest to use, however the PHP one will be more customizable for those who know how to code.